[En-Nut-Discussion] Timer resolution....

[Czerteak]

Hi,

I was just wondering whether there's an easy way to get better system clock 
resolution. Digging through the sources (and experimenting, too) brought me 
to the magic number of 62 which seems to be the shortest interval you can 
wait (zero is considered exception). I need to get some data from the outside 
through the data/adress bus and send them in the interval of 30ms. Whe I use 
NutSleep(30) (or any other number between 1 and 62) it always returns after 
62ms which is too long time period for me. On the other hand, send the data 
at maximal speed (about 1ms according to my measuring) is too much.

I know about NutDelay which can be used to achieve that but it eats up the 
whole CPU and other threads are frozen which is bad for me, too. :-(

I have a feeling that the clock ticks are interrupt driven. Is there a way to 
make these interrupts appear at higher frequency?

Czerteak

P.S.: Thanks for the previous help. The fault was (as usual) on my side -> one 
stupid wire was unplugged so the device reacted to more addresses than it was 
supposed to... :-(