[En-Nut-Discussion] Supporting Other Target Platforms (Porsche911 is better than a Golf but sorry , I need a small car)
Ralph Mason
ralph.mason at telogis.com
Tue Feb 10 08:35:39 CET 2004
I have written windows comport drivers for windows. Then use an external
modem, with ppp.
Ralph
>
>Lucky boy!
>fdopen doesn't work here with winsock, is this problem resolved for you ?
>So, I/O streams are emulated by not very attractive send/recv (a packet of
>fputc() may crash XP).
>JP
>
>
>
>
>>Waste a little time to create an abstraction layer and then develop ,
>>test, debug your high layer applications on confortable environment
>>e.g. PC, linux, Windows (equiped with MMU) and without real-time
>>constraints (very important). Create I/O simulators if needed.
>>And when all is OK,compile and test your software on the target.
>>(in fact, the both compilers windows are always open here and point to
>>the same sources) And... maintain dual environment for portability and
>>bug tracking.
>>In fact, you will save a lot of time. No MMU is no problem.
>>Except for 10 exp(6) lines of code, system, low layers or I/O oriented
>>applications.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>I have already done this for windows, and can run and debug the complete
>NutOS (except Ethernet drivers) using visual stido.
>
>Ralph
>
>_______________________________________________
>En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
>En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
>http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
>En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
>http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>
>
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list