AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] Bug Report

[Harald Kipp]

Hi Oliver,

At 08:52 16.01.2004 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>
>thanks for finding this bug.
>I think the first intention of not reallocating smaller buffer sizes is 
>not to waste time for over and over releasing and reserving heap memory again.

Indeed, that has been the intention.



>But of course, if just a smaller buffer size is needed, the nb_XX.sz must 
>be adjusted to the smaller buffer.
>For every buffer type I will add an else part to set the correct nb_XX.sz 
>value.

I'm completely suprised at this bug. It sits there
for years and I can't remember having seen extra
bytes being transmitted...really good job, Mike.

Thanks for the commit, Oliver. You may have
realized too, that this function is crying
"Optimze me". :-)

Harald