AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] Again Semaphore implementation

[Ole Reinhardt]

Hi Oliver,

> sorry to say that, but you didn't found the real bug. By enhancing the
range
> of SEM.value to negative numbers and decrementing the value now in the
first
> line of NutSemWait, you made a kind of workaround.

I see... My implementation I took from my Operating Systems course at
University. But it's not necessarily better.

> So I would have simply suggested to change in NutSemWait the call to
> NutEventWait to NutEventWaitNext. This function ignores the signalled
state
> of the event queue.

I'll try to change this tooo... To be on the secure side.

> Just one thing: Can you please also adjust the comparison in
NutSemTryWait,
> so it can work appropriatly?

Sorry, I missed that. I've just changed this point too...

> PS: Don't forget to change the Changelog.

Just have done so.

Regards,

Ole
-- 
kernel concepts    Tel: +49-271-771091-14
Dreisbachstr. 24   Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57250 Netphen    E+ : +49-177-7420433
--