AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] my mutex & semaphore implementation

[Oliver Schulz]

Hi Matthias,

nice and short implementation of mutex and semaphore handling. I think,
it's a good choice to add it to Nut/OS.

But one question, in mutex implementation you used the terms Lock and
Unlock, and in semaphore implementation the terms Wait and Post. Why
that difference for the same kind of functions?

Cheers,
Oliver.

> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
> [mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de]Im Auftrag von Matthias
> Ringwald
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. Mai 2004 21:47
> An: Ethernut User Chat (English)
> Betreff: [En-Nut-Discussion] my mutex & semaphore implementation
> 
> 
> hi
> 
> as recently announced, I implemented recursive mutex functions and 
> semaphores for nut/os.
> have a look at:
> 
> http://www.inf.ethz.ch/~mringwal/downloads/nut-semaphore.tar.gz
> http://www.inf.ethz.ch/~mringwal/downloads/nut-mutex.tar.gz
> 
> if there are no complaints, I'd like to put it into the os/ directory.
> if people don't like it there, it could be put on the 
> ethernut project 
> page.
> 
> greets,
> matthias
> 
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>