[En-Nut-Discussion] Major memory mapping changes?

[Radek Podgorny]

Hi,

I'm not sure what you mean by JTAG ICE. I use JTAG to program the device but 
that's all. No runtime debugging or stuff...

Radek


> Hi Radek,
>
> 0xE000 should be still available with Ethernut 2.x.
>
> Are you running with or without JTAG ICE?
>
> Regards,
>
> Harald
>
> At 13:06 19.10.2004 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've been using Ethernut 1.3 so far without any serious problems. I use it
> > to control some IO boards which are connected directly to the address and
> > data bus. It works in a simple way where I write to *(xdata unsigned char
> > *) (0xe000) and the board just knows I want to talk to it and takes the
> > data. Reading works the same. Unfortunately, with Ethernut 2.1, this got
> > broken. The writing is still functional but when I try to read from this
> > memory area (which should be AFAIK not occupied by any device) I just get
> > all 0xff. :-( Don't you know what could be wrong? Of course I can change
> > the address of the boards to something else but I don't have time to try
> > all possible combinations so I would need a hint... :-(
> >
> >Thanks...
> >Radek Podgorny
>
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion

-- 
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x98E56D84
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.egnite.de/pipermail/en-nut-discussion/attachments/20041019/7c28e9c3/attachment-0001.pgp>