[En-Nut-Discussion] NutEventWait - Suggested Change
Ralph Mason
ralph.mason at telogis.com
Thu Jan 13 21:00:55 CET 2005
This is probably contentious since it would break lots of existing code.
At the moment Calling NutEventWait with a timeout of 0 makes it wait
forever. I think this is wrong, calling it with a timeout of zero
should return the signaled state of the event or return immediately with
-1 (perhaps with a Yield)
A define of INFINITE should be make with a value of -1 to do the Job
that 0 does at the moment.
This means you could do non blocking reads on sockets and devices etc
and make it cleaner (IMHO).
Ralph.
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list