[En-Nut-Discussion] NutEventWait - Suggested Change

[Harald Kipp]

>
>         Definitely sounds like a more reasonable interface - but you
>could create a new call that references the old one rather than replacing
>the old one. That would maintain backwards compatibility with existing
>code.
>
>         Austin

It's not just NutEventWait() but a number of other functions like
various ioctl's, NutUdpReceiveFrom() and more. I fear, that
specifying that large number of new function names would
increase the confusion for newbies.

Harald