[En-Nut-Discussion] discussing changes in hd44780.c for a 4x20 display
Tim Lapawa
tim at lapawa.net
Mon Mar 7 13:45:01 CET 2005
Hi Ole,
at the weekend I added a new configuration entry for the display type.
With this choose entry everyone can select the LCD size for both hd44780 drivers.
They use the same generated #defines. I decided to put them in cfg/dev/lcd.h
But currently I can test it only with my 4x40 display. I do not own the other ones.
greetings
Tim
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:56:54AM +0100, Ole Reinhardt wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> > And the cruel addressing does not fit into the current hd44780.c and term.c
> > scheme.
>
> Me I had the same experience too. There are so many display controllers
> out there all more or less compatible with the old hd44780 scheme. Even
> me I had three different display / address mappings during my
> development experience.
>
> I agree with you that we should think about a more generic character to
> address calculation routine and move the address calculation completely
> into the device driver.
>
> If Harald agree I'd like to change this and commit the changed into cvs.
> This hopefully should not brake too much code.
>
> Bye,
>
> Ole
>
> --
> kernel concepts Tel: +49-271-771091-14
> Dreisbachstr. 24 Fax: +49-271-771091-19
> D-57250 Netphen E+ : +49-177-7420433
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
--
\\\///
Tim Lapawa (o -) tim at lapawa.net
-------------oo0-(_)-0oo----------------------
,ooo0 Where do you want
( ) 0ooo, to go tomorrow?
---\ (---------( )----------------------
\ _ ) ) /
( _ /
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list