AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] irqstack.h in cvs

[Matthias Ringwald]

Hi Oliver

one short follow up question on this.
by replacing a macro with a function call, the latency is increased.
do you have an idea on how much ?
or is this negectable, as so far the Nut/OS IRQ dispatcher was used  
anyway?

cheers,
  matthias

On 08.10.2005, at 15:39, Oliver Schulz wrote:

> Hi William,
>
> Let me explain my changes.
> The main intention for the change is to move the whole push/pop  
> code out of
> the macro definition to a separate function. This results in  
> smaller program
> code, b/c in the former code, for _each_ used interrupt the whole  
> push/pop
> code was generated by the compiler.