[En-Nut-Discussion] Other ARM ports

Harald Kipp harald.kipp at egnite.de
Mon Jul 17 12:22:51 CEST 2006

Just recently a platform independent interrupt handling
interface had been introduced. As most drivers directly
accessed CPU registers (and some still do), they won't
run on different targets. Further, GPIO handling still
isn't portable and would require a bunch of #ifdefs.

Thus, most drivers are placed in the arch/avr or arch/arm


At 22:21 14.07.2006 -0400, you wrote:
>Is there any reason that an ARM (AT91M55800A)  could not use the LAN91C111
>ethernet MAC versus the DM9000E?

More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list