[En-Nut-Discussion] NutTcpAccept() timeout
don at led.com.au
Fri Jul 21 03:19:27 CEST 2006
Henrik Maier wrote:
> This "BSD style" t/o socket option approach has the benefit that the API
> behaves more like the BSD API and what people would expect (as usual
> nobody reads the manual and expects things to work as usual) and it
> would not consume any additional memory resources.
> Yes it might break some existing applications...
> So I opt for Brett's case #1.
Likewise from me, minimal damage to existing codebase, required functionality
met, transparent if timeout not set.
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion