[En-Nut-Discussion] NutTcpAccept() timeout

Don Ingram don at led.com.au
Fri Jul 21 03:19:27 CEST 2006

Henrik Maier wrote:
...Snip ...
> This "BSD style" t/o socket option approach has the benefit that the API 
> behaves more like the BSD API and what people would expect (as usual 
> nobody reads the manual and expects things to work as usual) and it 
> would not consume any additional memory resources.
> Yes it might break some existing applications...
> So I opt for Brett's case #1.

Likewise from me, minimal damage to existing codebase, required functionality 
met, transparent if timeout not set.



More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list