[En-Nut-Discussion] ENJ28J60
Jesper Hansen
jesperh at telia.com
Wed May 24 19:27:24 CEST 2006
I've had a ENC28J60 running for months on a web-server with a mega128
clocked at 7.2728 MHz, and have had no problems at all with it.
I've two other boards with ENC28J60's on and haven't notices any
problems with those either. None of these are even close to 8 MHz SPI
frequency !
Also note that the 2k bias resistor that was recommended on the early
devices should now be 2.7k. This lowers current consumption
considerably, I'm not sure how much though, haven't measured.
/Jesper
Bengt Florin wrote:
> Also the current status of the ENC28J60 (Rev B4) silicon makes it
> practically unusable for most CPU's, as the SPI interface doesn't work
> properly for clock rates under 8MHz.
>
> Silicon Rev B5 is said to correct this, but Microchip has yet not announced
> when this will be available.
>
> Also, I agree to Haralds comment. Power consumption is way too high.
>
> Another interesting CPU to port Nut to would be the Freescale Coldfire
> MCF52235, a true single chip solution as it also contains an Ethernet PHY.
>
> I remember reading some comments from Erik Lins to port Nut to Coldfire
> MCF5282.
> Well yes, it was back in 2004. Time flies.
>
> Any interest of, or progress in the Coldfire direction?
>
> /bengt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
> [mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de] On Behalf Of Harald Kipp
> Sent: den 22 maj 2006 09:39
> To: Ethernut User Chat (English)
> Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] ENJ28J60
>
> Hello Richard,
>
> At 17:43 21.05.2006 -0400, you wrote:
>> MIcrochip ENC28J60 Has anyone been able to use this IC with Ethernut? Been
>> considering making a Ethernut board and using this, but I am terrible at
>> writing drivers... I see code to operate the IC in the AVRlib,
>
> After Erik Lins pointed me to the electrical characteristics,
> namely the operating current, I lost my interest in this chip.
>
>> also any drivers for the newer MP3 IC's from VLSI 1002 or 1003?
>>
>
> Due to missing hardware (Medianut still uses the old VS1001K),
> we never worked on an update. I agree that this is very sad.
>
> Harald
>
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>
>
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list