[En-Nut-Discussion] Overflow in At91GetPllClock()

[Harald Kipp]

Many thanks, Ben. However, this had been fixed already in CVS using
the same hack.
http://ethernut.cvs.sourceforge.net/ethernut/nut/ChangeLog?revision=1.354

Harald


At 15:55 11.09.2006 +1200, you wrote:

>But At91GetPllClock() tries to calculate 18,432,000*250, which is
>4,608,000,000 -- a nice 32-bit overflow which mucks up the timing. I've
>fixed it by dividing the master clock frequency by 1000 beforehand, then
>multiplying by 1000 afterwards ... probably not the ideal fix, but here it
>is (from ostimer_at91.c):