[En-Nut-Discussion] CONFNET & DNS
Ernst Stippl
ernst at stippl.org
Sat Aug 11 09:09:29 CEST 2007
Hi Dusan!
good idea!
regards
ernst
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
[mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de] Im Auftrag von Dusan Ferbas
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. August 2007 00:00
An: en-nut-discussion at egnite.de
Betreff: [En-Nut-Discussion] CONFNET & DNS
Hi developers,
when DHCP fails, it uses IP address, mask & gw from CONFNET. It does not use
DNS settings. It is well documented in pro/dhcpc.c:NutDhcpIfConfig().
There is a plenty of currently unused space in EEPROM (Nut/OS reserved
area). I suggest to extend CONFNET structure by 8 bytes with
u_long cdn_pdns; /*!< \brief Primary DNS address. */
u_long cdn_sdns; /*!< \brief Secondary DNS address. */
Also this change invokes an idea to pass whole CONFNET instead of passing
individual arguments - NutNetIfConfig2(), NutNetIfSetup()
Then NutDhcpIfConfig() wil be able to configure DNS servers with
NutDnsConfig2() also in case dhcp fails.
What do you guys think ?
Dusan
_______________________________________________
http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.11/944 - Release Date: 09.08.2007
14:44
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list