[En-Nut-Discussion] Interrupt definitions on AVR platform

[Ernst Stippl]

Hi Ole!

Ok for me, but I should add that I do not have to maintain a
significant-sized code base.
Interestingly, this was a rather long debate within the avr-gcc mailing list
...

regards
ernst 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
[mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de] Im Auftrag von Ole Reinhardt
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. Juli 2007 14:00
An: en-nut-discussion at egnite.de
Betreff: [En-Nut-Discussion] Interrupt definitions on AVR platform

Hi all,

I'd like to suggest to change the intterupt code in NutOS to be compliant
with the new intterupt API of avrlibc.

http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/group__avr__interrupts.html#g67cd
0dea412157775c2f2a3ffe9fb8ff

We could define a compatibility macro to map SIGNAL() to ISR() for old
compilers / old avr-libc.

What's your opinion?

best regards,

Ole Reinhardt

-- 
kernel concepts GbR             Tel:   +49-271-771091-14
Inh. Faerber & Kirchner         Fax:   +49-271-771091-19
Sieghütter Hauptweg 48          Mobil: +49-177-7420433
D-57072 Siegen                  UstID: DE 205 648 898

_______________________________________________
http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date: 03.07.2007
10:02