[En-Nut-Discussion] MASK and SPACE support for 9bit frame

[Henrik Maier]

I second that. Nut/OS extension like for example this 9-bit mode could be
enabled and configured using a nutconf definition. That way the
functionality of Nut/OS can continue to grow but the code footprint of the
libraries still stays at a reasonable small level.

It also decreases the risk of an extension breaking existing code as the
functionality is not compiled in for most users.

Henrik


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alain M. [mailto:alainm at pobox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2007 2:41 AM
> To: Ethernut User Chat (English)
> Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] MASK and SPACE support for 9bit frame
> 
> 
> power ip escreveu:
> > i changed usartavr.c,add MASK and SPACE support for 9bit frame
>  >    MASK - Transmit as address frame bit9=1
>  >    SPACE - Transmit as data frame bit9=0
> 
> As this is a bit big for who will not use it, I suggest that It would
> be
> include within an #ifdef.
> 
> Not that I don't like, I already had to use something like that, but
> only very eventualy...
> 
> Alain
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion