[En-Nut-Discussion] Fwd: Not fixed!!!: Re: confirmed!!! Re: NutOS 4.4.0 on ARM7: possibly bug in NutEnterCritical / NutExitCritical
Alain M.
alainm at pobox.com
Wed Feb 27 21:35:07 CET 2008
Harald Kipp escreveu:
> Alain M. schrieb:
>> So I believe that there are two alternatives left:
>>
>> a) use a global variable. This will be a lot slower due to ARM's
>> pipeline architecture.
>>
>> b) Call NutEnterCritical/NutExitCritical obsolete, create a new with a
>> parameter for the storage variable. But *replace* *only* the few ones
>> that do have a problem with stack, wich I believe are few.
>
> Why not do both?
There is only one reason not to use allways the "global variable"
approach: it is much slower, each instance is 4 memory accesses most in
time critical parts of the code. That means that it is a fix that will:
1) slow down NutOS as a whole, speed *is* a strong point of Nut/OS
2) bring timing problems to existing apps!!!
We counted 106 instances of NutEnterCritical in 34 files, only 2 or 3
will need that...
Alain
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list