[En-Nut-Discussion] SAM9260-EK getting started
steve
fishbeetle at googlemail.com
Mon Jul 14 22:03:28 CEST 2008
Alain,
Thanks for the hint, however I can't find any comprehensible documentation
on this, can you please point me in the right direction.
How does the compiler/linker know where the internal SRAM blocks are?
Does it automatically include the code to copy my code to the SRAMs.
Thanks again.
Steve.
At 17:31 14/07/2008, you wrote:
>search for "ramfunc", I found it in sam7 code. It inicializes a prefix
>that sends a single function to ram. It can be further expanded to use
>both internal ram blocks.
>
>Alain
>PS: I send a message by mistake to the list, I was just checking info
>from some comments (it was in portuguese)
>
>steve escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Further to my problems getting the expected performance from the
> > 9260 processor it seems the limiting factor is bus speed to the
> > external SDRAMs (notwithstanding the lack of clarity over whether
> > or not the caches are actually doing anything). Given that the
> > max bus speed is 100MHz plus the necessary latencies in SDRAM
> > accesses this results in a best-case net performance NO BETTER
> > than a 48MHz ARM7!
> >
> > It would therefore seem that the only hope of achieving any
> > improvement on this would be if best use could be made of the
> > 8Kbytes internal fast ram. Does anyone know of any mechanism
> > to persuade the compiler/linker to place critical bits of code
> > / data and perhaps the stack in internal SRAM?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Steve.
> >
> >
> > At 14:01 13/07/2008, you wrote:
> >> steve wrote:
> >>> If I program the webradio application into dataflash on my 9260-EK,
> >>> (along with the Atmel bootloader) then it works. Programming directly
> >>> into SDRAM @ 0x20000000 it fails. Clearly there's something in that
> >>> bootloader that makes all the difference, does this make any sense?
> >> Indeed, there may be a missing initialization in the SAM-BA ROM or the
> >> Webradio, which is provided by the boot loader. Unfortunately I haven't
> >> had the time to test all this here. At least I do have the same board
> >> revision 1.0.
> >>
> >>> I now have another problem - my LJG JPEG decompression application
> >>> runs slightly _SLOWER_ on the 9260-EK (CPU clk 90.3MHz) than on my old
> >>> SAM7X-EK (CPU clock at 48MHz). I moved to ARM9 specifically to get
> >>> more speed, does anyone have any idea why?
> >> I had a discussion with Atmel about similar experiences with the MP3
> >> fixed point software decoder used in the webradio. They later changed
> >> the SDRAM initialization (SAM-BA script and bootloader) and performance
> >> increased. It was still slower than expected, but significantly faster
> >> than the SAM7X. In case you are using an old SAM-BA Tool or boot loader...
> >>
> >> Harald
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________
>http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list