[En-Nut-Discussion] NutHeapRealloc

[Moritz Struebe]

Thiago A. Corrêa schrieb:
>   Is there a newer version of the  NutHeapRealloc code?
>   
Yes. I attached the tested one. It shouldn't be a big deal to use what 
you like. I added quite a lot of other functions like assigning memory 
to threads, or failing free if the dead beef is corrupted. But they are 
ifdefed.


>   If no one objects, I could commit this.
>   
I tried to do decent documentation. If you want more just ask.

>   Moritz, did you identify any part of ethernut that we could simply
> the code by using this new function?
>   

I didn't really look. I needed it for my code - well I thought I would. 
But working with sensor networks I think it's a reasonable function to have.

Cheers
Morty

> Kind Regards,
>     Thiago A. Correa
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Moritz Struebe <morty at gmx.net> wrote:
>   
>> Ok, just ran a total of 100K malloc, realloc and free operations.
>>  I think my NutHeapRealloc is quite stable now. Ping me is you are
>>  interested.
>>
>>  Cheers
>>  Morty
>>
>>
>>  Moritz Struebe schrieb:
>>
>>     
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>       
>>  >
>>  > I've written an nutHeapRealloc(). I didn't do intense testing yet, but I
>>  > think it should be working. Maybe someone wants to take a look at it.
>>  >
>>  > Morty
>>  >
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>
>