[En-Nut-Discussion] Discovery hostname field is smaller than confos.hostname

[Thiago A. Corrêa]

Any thoughts? Is it ok if I go forward with this change?

On 11/14/08, Thiago A. Corrêa <thiago.correa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>    A client of mine has noticed that the discovery protocol´s hostname
>  is limited to 8 bytes, while the rest of the system (confos.hostname)
>  has 16 bytes, like replies to DHCP server.
>
>    Would it be problematic if we shrink the custom field and increase
>  the hostname field ? It seams it's not used for anything, despite the
>  comment on the struct.
>
>  Kind Regards,
>    Thiago A. Correa
>