[En-Nut-Discussion] Discovery hostname field is smaller than confos.hostname
Thiago A. Corrêa
thiago.correa at gmail.com
Fri Nov 14 16:14:00 CET 2008
A client of mine has noticed that the discovery protocol´s hostname
is limited to 8 bytes, while the rest of the system (confos.hostname)
has 16 bytes, like replies to DHCP server.
Would it be problematic if we shrink the custom field and increase
the hostname field ? It seams it's not used for anything, despite the
comment on the struct.
Thiago A. Correa
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion