[En-Nut-Discussion] RFC: Some kind of library for often needed functions
Ole Reinhardt
ole.reinhardt at embedded-it.de
Tue Feb 17 13:12:10 CET 2009
Hi,
> What about "contrib" as the directory or repository name?
Sounds reasonable for me.
> Does it really make sense to include such code in the standard Nut/OS
> distro? What about setting up an additional separate code repository for
> these contributed packages?
Ok, problem is, that some of the internal NutOS code might also need to
use these functions. Base64 decoding for example. So I would vote to add
this code to the normal directory structure.
> If the repository is separate, the requirements of contributed code could be
> less stringent. For example it wouldn't have to compile for all compiler
> versions or architectures. It also wouldn't need to be maintained to make
> sure it compiles with future versions of Nut/OS.
If we just start to implement such a library It's a good idea to also
maintain it further. Otherwise we'll end up with lots of dead code.
Bye,
Ole
--
_____________________________________________________________
| |
| Embedded-IT Hard- und Softwarelösungen |
| |
| Ole Reinhardt Tel. / Fax: +49 (0)271 7420433 |
| Luisenstraße 29 Mobil: +49 (0)177 7420433 |
| 57076 Siegen eMail: ole.reinhardt at embedded-it.de |
| Germany Web: http://www.embedded-it.de |
| UstID / VAT: DE198944716 |
|_____________________________________________________________|
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list