[En-Nut-Discussion] Optimizing nutconf

[Ole Reinhardt]

Hi,

> > Thiago added an abstract class, which simplifies the code for scanning
> > directories. Unfortunately
> >
> >  g++ (GCC) 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)
> >
> > doesn't aacept line 723 of nutconfdoc.cpp:
> >
> >  virtual ~CAbstractDirCopyTraverser() = 0
> >  {
> >  }
> >
> > IMHO it is not allowed to have both, a pure-specifier and the
> > definition. Although, the MS compiler accepted that statement. Do we
> > need the  declaration of the destructor at all?
> 
> Actually, destructors are a speciall case in pure virtual syntax, they
> must always have a body, and since the compiler won't generate one if
> you declare it, you must provide one. Probably the compiler has a bug
> with the inline body.
> [...]
> So, it's quite safe to remove it. :)

So, I commented out the destructor again in CVS head as compilation
fails on linux otherwise. We could add it again not defined as inline
body.

Bye,

Ole

-- 
 _____________________________________________________________
|                                                             |
| Embedded-IT          Hard- und Softwarelösungen             |
|                                                             |
| Ole Reinhardt        Tel. / Fax:        +49 (0)271  7420433 |
| Luisenstraße 29      Mobil:             +49 (0)177  7420433 |
| 57076 Siegen         eMail:    ole.reinhardt at embedded-it.de |
| Germany              Web:         http://www.embedded-it.de |
|                      UstID / VAT:       DE198944716         |
|_____________________________________________________________|