[En-Nut-Discussion] L9260 Initialization..[Was: Nut/OS Initialization ]

[Alain M.]

There is not much... Olimex has a CD with a Linux that runs on it, but 
As I also wanted to run Nut, I follwed just Nut's documentation, 
specially in crt.S

Alain

John E escreveu:
> Alain,
> 
> Do you have any advice? I noticed that Olimex L9260 specific documentation
> was limited.
> 
> Thanks
> John
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Alain M. <alainm at pobox.com> wrote:
> 
>> PragmaLab escreveu:
>>> what about getting the address of the reset vector and start debugging
>> from
>>> there? Just look in the map-file. I'm not familiar with Eclipse but at
>> least
>>> it must be possible to set breakpoints on (HW)addresses.
>> It seams like it is easy, but I never manged to make it. If you set a
>> breakpoint using the debugger, Eclipse does not enter the source level
>> debugging mode. It could take an expert in Eclipse to do that, if anyone
>> can find one...
>>
>>> But let us stay focussed on the interesting discussion of how the HW
>>> initialisation can be improved in NutOS. Calling code before main:
>> nothing
>>> wrong about that IMHO. Cannot think of another way to get your int i=5;
>> done
>>> runtime. In NutOS quite a lot of initialisation is done before calling
>>> main(). Debugging has never been a problem (for me).
>> It has for me ... with NutOS ... on an ARM9 board from Olimex. I spent
>> days to find a simple error in the startup initialization, and still
>> some more to go because debugg is not working well, only program load.
>> Call it a recurrent nightmare :(
>>
>> That is whi, INHO, the more that I can push to after main() the simpler
>> it can get :)
>>
>> Alain
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
> 
>