[En-Nut-Discussion] Problem with DHCP
Ulrich Prinz
uprinz2 at netscape.net
Thu Oct 15 22:40:44 CEST 2009
Hi!
Thanks, for beeing active in that area. I discovered, that the DHCP is
not the Problem in the latest EIR software. It simply dies cause the
system dies elswhere.
But there are different problems in the DHCP system. I try to resume
from my mind...
I had a system configured for a class B network by dhcp. It got an
address like 10.201.49.129/255.255.0.0
Then I plugged it into the voip network and did not get a new address.
It tried for hours before I got back to the system and checked it's ip.
To solve the problem quickly I simply used a second setup that never got
an ip as it was used for another project. It was configured by dhcp
without a problem.
Then we needed several systems in a network and all of them that never
where set up by dhcp where working, from the others only the ones, that
already had an address from that network. None of them could be
connected to another network again. So I implemented a quick hack as
these systems ha buttons and a display. So I added a menu point for
reflashing the netconf sector to 0xFF. After rebooting it starts and
uses dhcp without a problem.
I hope, that these information may help you. If you have any things to
test, just pass the code over and I try it.
Best regards, Ulrich
Michael Jones schrieb:
> Ulrich Prinz Wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>> I am using some Nut/OS based systems that need to work in different
>> networks with DHCP. Some of them are moved several times a week into
>> totally different networks.
>> Every time the DHCP reassign of the saved address fails, as the network
>> is a different one, the device hangs inside the dhcp routines.
>> A quick hack was to erase the saved address from the network settings.
>> Therefore I use a button that is checked on power-up and if it is
>> pressed the saved dhcp settings are erased. But that should not be the
>> solution. AFAIK the process fails at the point, where the DHCP get a
>> NACK from the dhcp server after trying to get the saved address reassigned.
>> Did someone already change that procedure and can provide some modified
>> code?
>>
>> Best regards, Ulrich
>
> Hi,
> I'm currently investigating some network related issues and the behavior you
> described above it one of them. The current schedule suggests that this will
> be solved within the next two weeks...
>
> Cu,
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list