[En-Nut-Discussion] Porting Nut/OS to atmel's SAM3U (cortex-m3)

[Ulrich Prinz]

 From former work I did at Philips I learned, that it is possibly the 
best to branch for any bigger change.

So I'd urge you to start two branches from the trunk to merge cortexM3 
and another for the USB. Otherwise it will be a hell of work if more 
than one developer is trying to help in one or the other task.

Why not branching dev_cortex and dev_usb as separate development 
streams. Later we then can merge them back into the trunk.

CU, Ulrich

Am 09.04.2010 14:22, schrieb Harald Kipp:
> On 09.04.2010 12:25, Ole Reinhardt wrote:
>> But I'm still working on the at91 usb client implementation.
>> Mostly build uppon the concepts of the lufa library.
>
> Interesting, never heard of it before. Oh, yeah, well, may be you
> mentioned it at our meeting in Nuremberg. I'm an old man, ya'know. ;-)
>
>
>> But wouldn't it be nice to implement the things as portable as possible?
>
> Sure. Nikolay's code should have become a starting point, something
> that's working. But for the reasons I mentioned in my earlier post, his
> patch requires more work.
>
>> What's about the idea to create branches for this kind of experimental
>> code?
>
> You mean Nikolay's patch or your USB port? Or both? I'd prefer not to
> check in the Cortex patch unless we can make sure, that it strictly
> honors all copyrights.
>
> Beside that, I'm not yet familiar with Subversion branch handling. So I
> better keep my fingers off. You, or who ever, are welcome to go ahead
> and I'll jump in.
>
> Harald
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion