[En-Nut-Discussion] STM32: arm-gcc versus arm-none-eabi-gcc

Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Wed Apr 27 13:11:46 CEST 2011


as I didn't find a RPM package for arm-none-eabi-gcc for my Opensuse Linux
system, I tried yesterday to follow the instructions in enswm28e.pdf to
compile arm-gcc on my own. After realizing the typos in the instructions, I
managed to compile an arm-gcc, but compling eth ethernut library failed

However: Is arm-gcc the right compiler for the STM32?

Thinking longer, arm-gcc is probably for the ARM variant used in AT91SAM3
and I need arm-none-eabi-gcc for STM32/Cortex3. Can anybody confirm? 

This is probably what Ulrich tried to tell me with "You should try to
compile with cm3-gcc"

Uwe Bonnes                bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list