[En-Nut-Discussion] devnut_m3n and possibly others: Locating the Linker script
bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Sun Dec 18 13:44:49 CET 2011
>>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Prinz <ulrich.prinz at googlemail.com> writes:
Ulrich> Hi Uwe, I cannot follow...
Ulrich> Here it works without a problem, so I simply set up a new
Ulrich> project on STM32F100RBT6 and compiled nut/os then uart
Ulrich> application. No problem.
Ulrich> Then I saw that you wrote 'outside the branch' and I don't know
Ulrich> what you mean. But I checked Makevars.cm3-gcc and found
E.g. "stm32_can_app" is the application tree.
By "out of the branch", I meant e.g.
versus "in the branch"
Ulrich> ARCH = cm3 TRGT = arm-none-eabi- MCFLAGS = -mcpu=$(MCU) -mthumb
Ulrich> -mlittle-endian -D__CORTEX__
Ulrich> // CXXFLAGS_OPT = -Os -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
Ulrich> -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti LDFLAGS = $(MCFLAGS) -g -nostartfiles
Ulrich> -T$(LDSCRIPT) -Wl,-Map=$(PROJ).map,--cref,--no-warn-mismatch
Ulrich> where you can see in the last line that -T$(LDSCRIPT).
Ulrich> That one should be build by the .nut files through
Ulrich> qnutconf. There is no filename separation from file-path in the
Ulrich> lua functions. And it is more or less a copy from existing
I use the command line tool "nutconf" most of the time, as this fits better
in a "make" environment than a gui tool.
Ulrich> Have you any suggestion how to solve that? And did you compile
Ulrich> in linux or windows?
Fix lua or work around that defienency? Will try to have a look.
I primary work on Linux. However I try to keep WIN interoperation in mind.
Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion