[En-Nut-Discussion] Do we need something like sbv/sbi to complement sbi/cbi?

Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Fri Dec 30 16:16:37 CET 2011

>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Moore <nategoose at gmail.com> writes:

    >>  Just in case someone uses something like
    >> sbv(MYREG, 0x0011 | 0x2200).
    Nathan> And people are likely to do that using MACRO names of fields
    Nathan> within control registers.


your mail isn't clear about your vote _for_ or _against_ such macros.

Anyways, I have added the braces proposed by Harald to my tree.

While sbi translate into something like s_et b_it i_ndex (index or field),
sbv would translate into s_et b_it v_alue. Both kind of macros should coexist.


Uwe Bonnes                bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list