[En-Nut-Discussion] Do we need something like sbv/sbi to complement sbi/cbi?
bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Fri Dec 30 16:16:37 CET 2011
>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Moore <nategoose at gmail.com> writes:
>> Just in case someone uses something like
>> sbv(MYREG, 0x0011 | 0x2200).
Nathan> And people are likely to do that using MACRO names of fields
Nathan> within control registers.
your mail isn't clear about your vote _for_ or _against_ such macros.
Anyways, I have added the braces proposed by Harald to my tree.
While sbi translate into something like s_et b_it i_ndex (index or field),
sbv would translate into s_et b_it v_alue. Both kind of macros should coexist.
Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion