[En-Nut-Discussion] branches/devnut_m3n: Status of device support

[Ulrich Prinz]

Not yet.

I'd prefer the ATMEL like style to separate the different layers. That 
enables to split the configuration in (q)nutconf too and gives the 
beginner sort of a step by step config.
1) VID/PID, Power, Nr. of Endpoints...
2) Device Type Selection
3) Device Feature Selection

Best Regards
Ulrich


-----Original Message-----
From: Uwe Bonnes <bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: Ethernut User Chat (English) <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2011 11:28 am
Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] branches/devnut_m3n: Status of device 
support


>>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Prinz <uprinz2 at netscape.net> writes:    
Ulrich> On 17.07.2011 16:14, Uwe Bonnes wrote:    >> Hello Ulrich,    
 >>     >> can you perhaps drop a note on the status of the device 
support in    >> the devnut_m3n tree? E.g. 
nut/arch/cm3/dev/stm/stm32_can1.c seems    >> quite usable, but 
canbus/candemo.c doesn't use it. I will play a    >> little with it and 
report back...    Ulrich> I try as promised, but here a short overview: 
    Ulrich> Missing: USB(-OTG) Is there some consense how an Ethernut 
USB device driver should look like?Otherwise thanks for the report!-- 
Uwe Bonnes                
bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.deInstitut fuer Kernphysik  
Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt--------- Tel. 06151 162516 
-------- Fax. 06151 164321 
----------_______________________________________________http://lists.egn
ite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion