[En-Nut-Discussion] Devnut_m3n: architecture dependend directories
ole.reinhardt at embedded-it.de
Mon Jan 16 16:53:15 CET 2012
> thinking about getting your massive file move into and later out of my
> playground make my (few) hairs even greyer ;-)
Sorry for that. The include/arch/cm3 directory got really confusing with
header files for three Cortex architectures and the CMSIS headers
> But shouldn't we have even more destinction, between vendor supplied files
> and NutOs-supplied files? At least for the stm32 files like
> are still the ST-Lib files with few modification, while files like
> are rewritten by Ulrich. The postion of the file in the file tree should
> clearly indicate the origin of the file.
> If all your lpc files are self written, this doesn't hold for you...
As Ulrich just mentioned:
As long as the author (STM in this case) agreed to add the files under
BSD license I think it's ok to held them together with the self-written
With the LCP files it's just the same. Sure I use e.g. the lpc17xx.h
with very little modifications. But the license is compatible with the
BSD style license. I don't see any problem why not place them together
with the self-written files.
Here I agree to Ulrich to avoid these conditional includes where ever
possible. See my comments on Ulrichs mail.
Thermotemp GmbH, Embedded-IT
Embedded Hard-/ Software and Open Source Development,
Integration and Consulting
Geschäftsstelle Siegen - Steinstraße 67 - D-57072 Siegen -
tel +49 (0)271 5513597, +49 (0)271-73681 - fax +49 (0)271 736 97
Hauptsitz - Hademarscher Weg 7 - 13503 Berlin
Tel +49 (0)30 4315205 - Fax +49 (0)30 43665002
Geschäftsführer: Jörg Friedrichs, Ole Reinhardt
Handelsregister Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 45978 UstID DE 156329280
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion