[En-Nut-Discussion] Switching to GIT
Thiago A. Corrêa
thiago.correa at gmail.com
Tue May 22 19:35:53 CEST 2012
I'm sometimes forced to use git but I try to only do as little as
possible with it because it's always a royal pain for me to work with.
You can never do anything without at least 20 minutes of googling.
I do see that it has a huge advantage over SVN when doing
branching/merging, specially merging. That's the interesting part
about DVCS, not the distributed part.
I've always used SVN and CVS before that, but now I've just
started using Mercurial for a new project to experiment with it and I
found it much easier than Git.
I'm not sure if we have a problem with SVN that we are trying to
solve, but if we do and we were to switch source control I would vote
for Mercurial over Git at this point.
Thiago A. Correa
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Uwe Bonnes
<bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> I brought up the discussion about switching to GIT some time before. As most
> branches now a obsolete, isn't it a good time to do the swicth now?
> With git svn clone ... we can even keep the history.
> Any ideas?
> Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
> Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
> --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion