[En-Nut-Discussion] Stellaris Licences, was: Re: Ethernut on TI's ...

[Philipp Burch]

Uwe,

On 10/29/2012 09:33 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>>>>>> "Philipp" == Philipp Burch <phip at hb9etc.ch> writes:
>
> ...
>      Philipp> It seems rather unrelated to the StellarisWare package and is
>      Philipp> tagged with revision "32" of 27 March 2009.
>
>      Philipp> It could be possible to write a translator which generates a
>      Philipp> CMSIS file from the StellarisWare header, so we could get
>      Philipp> around this licensing issue. But besides being an annoying
>      Philipp> task, this would simply be stupid as the files are readily
>      Philipp> available...
>
> There was a TI license change somewhere in between. Before that change the
> files contained a disclaimer _not_ allowing to use the header in conjunction
> with BSDL like licenses. So forget about old revisison and use _only_ revisions
> after that license change.

it's not that I wanted to use old files/revisions. This is simply the 
only CMSIS-like distribution I could find at all. Or am I missing something?

Thanks,
Philipp