[En-Nut-Discussion] Bit banging drivers broken?

[Harald Kipp]

Hi Uwe,

On 04.10.2012 19:15, Uwe Bonnes wrote:

> Okay, you got me. I cared for AVR and STM, but not the rest. How to proceed?
> I think the NutGpio Api has clear advantage so reverting would be a step
> back.

I fully agree.

> And adding #if isn't appelling too. But I don't feel like I can
> complete the NutGpio functions for all architecture. So perhaps split off
> the old file before my change with a similar name, but some addition to mark
> it as transitory.

Wouldn't it be safer to do it the other way round, selecting a new name
for the new functions and upgrade and test existing drivers one by one?

Please note, that other developers (like me) have existing applications,
which will break.

Regards,

Harald