[En-Nut-Discussion] Bit banging drivers broken?
harald.kipp at egnite.de
Fri Oct 5 13:09:32 CEST 2012
On 04.10.2012 19:15, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Okay, you got me. I cared for AVR and STM, but not the rest. How to proceed?
> I think the NutGpio Api has clear advantage so reverting would be a step
I fully agree.
> And adding #if isn't appelling too. But I don't feel like I can
> complete the NutGpio functions for all architecture. So perhaps split off
> the old file before my change with a similar name, but some addition to mark
> it as transitory.
Wouldn't it be safer to do it the other way round, selecting a new name
for the new functions and upgrade and test existing drivers one by one?
Please note, that other developers (like me) have existing applications,
which will break.
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion