[En-Nut-Discussion] Next Nut/OS 5 release candidate

Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Thu Oct 11 12:28:33 CEST 2012

>>>>> "Harald" == Harald Kipp <harald.kipp at egnite.de> writes:

    Harald> Hi Uwe, On 10.10.2012 21:49, Uwe Bonnes wrote:

    >> I also pushed about 20 changesets to SVN. They should (famous last
    >> words...)  be restricted to STM32 and owibus

    Harald> And the latter causes the following problem (probably on all ARM
    Harald> targets):

Could you test current svn?

I started a discusssion some time ago about the need for most GPIO_CFG
defines common. I couldn't make my arguments understandable. Are they more
understandable now?

Rethinking the commit, probably in nut/include/dev/gpio.h after all includes 
#if !defined(GPIO_CFG_INIT_HIGH)

#if !defined(GPIO_CFG_INIT_LOW)

would have been better. Should I do another commit?

Uwe Bonnes                bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list