[En-Nut-Discussion] STM32 IRQ Handler defines as naked?

Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Thu Jul 18 22:51:39 CEST 2013

>>>>> "Ole" == Ole Reinhardt <ole.reinhardt at embedded-it.de> writes:

    Ole> Hi Uwe, I'm just wondering: Some interrupt handlers in
    Ole> nut/arch/cm3/dev/stm are defined with __attribute__ ((naked)), some
    Ole> are not?

    Ole> For NXP I don't use them defined naked. Have you tested the naked
    Ole> implementations yet? And what is the reason you defined some
    Ole> handlers as naked and some not?

There is a lot of code in STM32 from Ulrich and maybe others. The log seems
to indicated that I didn't add the nacked code. Probably it entered by cut
and paste, as dev/atmel/ih_sam3xxx also shows the naked attribute on some

I will remove.

Uwe Bonnes                bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
ven       v

More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list