[En-Nut-Discussion] STM32 IRQ Handler defines as naked?
bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Thu Jul 18 22:51:39 CEST 2013
>>>>> "Ole" == Ole Reinhardt <ole.reinhardt at embedded-it.de> writes:
Ole> Hi Uwe, I'm just wondering: Some interrupt handlers in
Ole> nut/arch/cm3/dev/stm are defined with __attribute__ ((naked)), some
Ole> are not?
Ole> For NXP I don't use them defined naked. Have you tested the naked
Ole> implementations yet? And what is the reason you defined some
Ole> handlers as naked and some not?
There is a lot of code in STM32 from Ulrich and maybe others. The log seems
to indicated that I didn't add the nacked code. Probably it entered by cut
and paste, as dev/atmel/ih_sam3xxx also shows the naked attribute on some
I will remove.
Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion