[En-Nut-Discussion] MCD_ST_LIBERTY and ST_GUIDANCE_ONLY question
harald.kipp at egnite.de
Tue May 21 10:43:50 CEST 2013
On 21.05.2013 03:21, Henrik Maier wrote:
> On 20/05/2013 11:50 PM, Harald Kipp wrote:
>> As an alternative we may completely remove all non-BSDL header files and
>> let the user get them from a different source, clearly stating the
>> related license.
> I don't see any problem to remove the STM libraries from Nut/OS
> completely and have any user wishing to use STM32 CPUs to download it
> and copy it into an appropriate directory of the Nut/OS build tree.
It is not even required to copy something. The Configurator allows to
define first and last include path. Setting the last include on the chip
vendor's header path would be sufficient.
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion