[En-Nut-Discussion] Removal of 8-bit AVR support (Re: STM32L051 and LPUART)
jwoithe at atrad.com.au
Tue Oct 25 10:18:17 CEST 2016
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Ulrich Prinz wrote:
> Do _not_misunderstand that!
> I would _never_ design out AVR from the original NutO/S repositories,
> I _forked_ to github and started to plan how to keep the CortexM
> system consistent with the original NutO/S.
> But it is too much work to do that, so I stay on NutO/S and I do _not_
> design out AVR.
Ah, I see. Thank you for taking the time to clarify this and explaining the
context of the comments.
> Why did I thought about forking:
> [working with ARM CortexM3/CortexM0/etc]
Yes, I see why it was worth the experiment.
> However, it was no plan to rip out the AVR from the original NutO/S!
> Hope I saved you day :)
This is good to know and is a great way to finish my day. :-) Thanks again.
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion