<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Ted,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 troth@openavr.org wrote:<br>
<br>
> I would think that sticking to the standard (I'm assuming</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">> that linux, et. al. adhere to the C standard) would be best</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">> in the long term.<br>
<br>
> I have no idea about how wide-spread the use of your</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">> interface is, but within the nut source, the impact</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">> appears to be minimal.<br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Technically, there is no ANSI C standard for these functions. What we have is a huge body of code (in fact everyone else) which is different to my versions in Nut/OS. My feeling is it should be changed. However I can't do it immediately as the computer it is on is on the other side of Sydney. I hope to be back there by the end of the week.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Cheers,<br>
Peter Scandrett<br>
</font>