[En-Nut-Discussion] a LAN91C111 question?

[Alastair Jeremy]

Map your 64K so it does not appear as flat 64k, put a bank switching in &
have a big "hole" somewhere (eg. 16kb) that you can put the LAC91C111 chip
in, as well as other things.

Alternatively make the address decoding "leave out" SRAM in a small
location, and put the LAN chip in there instead.

Regards,

Alastair
  -----Original Message-----
  From: en-nut-discussion-admin at egnite.de
[mailto:en-nut-discussion-admin at egnite.de]On Behalf Of danny-cvs
  Sent: Thursday, 17 April 2003 11:52 AM
  To: en-nut-discussion at egnite.de
  Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] a LAN91C111 question?


  I now refer to ethernut 2 prototype to develop my board, and I have a
question:
  when I use 64K SRAM, how can I avoid the conflict of LAN91C111's base
address?
  Best Regard
  Danny Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.egnite.de/pipermail/en-nut-discussion/attachments/20030417/29b242ed/attachment.html>