[En-Nut-Discussion] strtok_r conflicts

[peter.scandrett at transport.alstom.com]

Ted,

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 troth at openavr.org wrote:

> I would think that sticking to the standard (I'm assuming
> that linux, et. al. adhere to the C standard) would be best
> in the long term.

> I have no idea about how wide-spread the use of your
> interface is, but within the nut source, the impact
> appears to be minimal.

Technically, there is no ANSI C standard for these functions. What we have 
is a huge body of code (in fact everyone else) which is different to my 
versions in Nut/OS. My feeling is it should be changed. However I can't do 
it immediately as the computer it is on is on the other side of Sydney. I 
hope to be back there by the end of the week.

Cheers,
Peter Scandrett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.egnite.de/pipermail/en-nut-discussion/attachments/20030812/a7d60317/attachment.html