[En-Nut-Discussion] Socket timeouts

[Ralph Mason]

You should not need any synchronisation between threads, because there is no
preemptive scheduling.

Your thread will only context switch if you let it.

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: en-nut-discussion-admin at egnite.de
> [mailto:en-nut-discussion-admin at egnite.de]On Behalf Of Damian Slee
> Sent: Friday, 19 September 2003 11:51
> To: en-nut-discussion at egnite.de
> Subject: RE: [En-Nut-Discussion] Socket timeouts
>
>
> I'm using SO_RCVTIMEO, mainly so I can do some other things on
> the same thread,  I could do it on another thread, but then would
> have to handle syncronising access to variables from different
> threads.  And some more resources would be used by the second thread.
>
> I'm not changing SO_SNDTIMEO.  ie leaving it as blocking, if the
> internally buffer can't take it all.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cosmin Buhu [mailto:cosminbuhu at lycos.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2003 9:03 PM
> To: en-nut-discussion at egnite.de
> Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] Socket timeouts
>
>
>
>
> 	Hello,
>
> 	Please if anyone can comment about socket timeouts,
> SO_SNDTIMEO and SO_RCVTIMEO, how are they acting and what should
> be a good strategy to use them.
>
> Thanks,
> Cosmin
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 1/09/2003
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 1/09/2003