[En-Nut-Discussion] IDE interface

[Jesper Hansen]

The WLAN cards cannot be compared to IDE interface as the register layout
is completely different.
Also, they only seem to work in I/O mode.

/Jesper

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Sloan" <rsloan2003 at hotmail.com>
To: <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] IDE interface


> Have you also done any thinking of also supporting WLAN WiFI type CF cards 
> on the same interface too? :-)
> 
> Are these cards like IDE interface or memory interface... any word on this?
> 
> Richard.
> 
> 
> >From: Harald Kipp <harald.kipp at egnite.de>
> >Reply-To: "Ethernut User Chat (English)" <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> >To: "Ethernut User Chat (English)" <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
> >Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] IDE interface
> >Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:15:12 +0100
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Harald, now its your part :-)
> >
> >Sigh! I know, I know....
> >
> >After intensively checking interface requirements and
> >drivers, I finally ended up with 74LVT16244/245 for
> >both CF and IDE and a XC95144XL CPLD.
> >
> >Perhaps the CPLD is a bit oversized...but we do not
> >know yet what might be required to handle the CF card's
> >wait signal in a fancy way.
> >
> >Ah, yes, and I finally dropped the idea of supporting
> >5V CF cards.
> >
> >Harald
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> >En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> >http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> 
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion