AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] Numerous LASTACK

[Oliver Schulz]

Hi Mike,

no problem. I can send you the sources this evening (in germany, it is about 8pm GMT+1), means in about 8 hours...

Regards,
Oliver.

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
> [mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de]Im Auftrag von Mike
> Cornelius
> Gesendet: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 11:04
> An: 'Ethernut User Chat (English)'
> Betreff: RE: [En-Nut-Discussion] Numerous LASTACK
> 
> 
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> I'lld very much like to try out your new tcpsm, if it will 
> take some time to
> get it into cvs could I trouble you to send it to me directly ?
> 
> Regards
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Mike Cornelius                      Internet: mikec at call-direct.com.au
> Call Direct Cellular Solutions      Phone:    +61 2 9209-4259
> Suite 145                           FAX:      +61 2 9209-4196
> National Innovation Centre          URL:      
> http://www.call-direct.com.au
> Australian Technology Park
> Eveleigh NSW 1430
> Australia                  
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
> [mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de] On Behalf Of 
> Oliver Schulz
> Sent: Monday, 14 June 2004 4:49 PM
> To: Ethernut User Chat (English)
> Subject: AW: [En-Nut-Discussion] Numerous LASTACK
> 
> Hi Jean Pierre,
> 
> I know, there are some bugs in TCP stack and I'm working on. 
> Currently I have some new/changed sources that need still 
> some testing. At
> my local environment it's very stable at the moment, even under heavy
> traffic with packet loss...
> 
> Because I don't have any test result from other developers, 
> this code is not
> yet in CVS.
> 
> Just tell me, if you want to test the "new" TCP stack.
> 
> Regards,
> Oliver.
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de
> > [mailto:en-nut-discussion-bounces at egnite.de]Im Auftrag von 
> Jean Pierre 
> > Gauthier
> > Gesendet: Montag, 14. Juni 2004 03:18
> > An: 'Ethernut User Chat (English)'
> > Betreff: [En-Nut-Discussion] Numerous LASTACK
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Despite the latest tcpsm.c (1.9.2.1.2.1  2004/04/15), tcpout
> > (1.1.1.1.4.1
> > 2004/04/15)and realtek driver nicrtl.c (Revision 1.6
> > 2004/05/17 ), some
> > (<1%?) TCP client connections are not ended correctly and stay in 
> > LASTACK state. Is that a TCP state machine bug / how to avoid this?
> > Jean Pierre
> > 
> > TRACE( httpd "Sockets" menu ):
> > Sockets
> > Handle Type Local           Remote              Status 
> > 8B3C TCP 192.168.0.102:80   192.168.0.201:1271  ESTABL 
> > 91CE TCP 192.168.0.102:6106 193.252.22.108:110  LASTACK 
> > 8A8A TCP 192.168.0.102:6099 195.68.47.19:80     LASTACK 
> > 583E TCP 192.168.0.102:6017 193.252.22.108:110  LASTACK 
> > 949F TCP 192.168.0.102:5992 217.12.6.8:80       LASTACK 
> > 88C8 TCP 192.168.0.102:5989 209.207.134.75:80   LASTACK 
> > 7C5E TCP 192.168.0.102:5988 193.252.117.130:80  LASTACK 7A4F TCP
> > 192.168.0.102:5542 193.252.22.108:110  LASTACK
> > 7D35 TCP 192.168.0.102:4105 217.12.6.8:80       LASTACK 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> > En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> > http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>