[En-Nut-Discussion] Compiler errors on signed/unsigned compares
Matthias Ringwald
mringwal at inf.ethz.ch
Mon Nov 7 20:43:52 CET 2005
Hi Hendriks
I might ask why you are using some compiler package from 2003.
And specifying the gcc resp. avr-libc version does help more then the
windows package date
(I'm not using windows, as you might have guess by now).
Otherwise gcc 4.0 complaints by default about signed/unsigned compares.
At least it emits warnings, which stop compiling.
So you might try a new compiler if you like and/or start fixing
the signedness issue.
matthias
On 07.11.2005, at 17:13, Michel Hendriks wrote:
> Now the funny/scary thing: Using WinAVR-20030913 the gcc compiler
> no longer
> complains about this!
More information about the En-Nut-Discussion
mailing list