[En-Nut-Discussion] Compiler errors on signed/unsigned compares

Matthias Ringwald mringwal at inf.ethz.ch
Mon Nov 7 20:43:52 CET 2005


Hi Hendriks

I might ask why you are using some compiler package from 2003.
And specifying the gcc resp. avr-libc version does help more then the  
windows package date
(I'm not using windows, as you might have guess by now).

Otherwise gcc 4.0 complaints by default about signed/unsigned compares.
At least it emits warnings, which stop compiling.

So you might try a new compiler if you like and/or start fixing
the signedness issue.

matthias

On 07.11.2005, at 17:13, Michel Hendriks wrote:

> Now the funny/scary thing: Using WinAVR-20030913 the gcc compiler  
> no longer
> complains about this!




More information about the En-Nut-Discussion mailing list