[En-Nut-Discussion] Nut/Net ARM port

[Henrik Maier]

Ralph Mason wrote:
> I think that the 64kb version will work fine for our application.  Ram 
> is mostly used in buffers so they don't increase in size because it's a 
> 32bit processor. Also it can process and free those buffers faster than 
> than an AVR.

Understood. I suppose we need twice as much stack space for the ARM 
(32-bit vs. 16 bit addresses)? And what about the density of the 
generated code compared to AVR? Is it similar or does the code take up 
more ROM space?

--
Henrik
http://www.proconx.com