[En-Nut-Discussion] AVR vs ARM pgm size

[Henrik Maier]

Ralph Mason wrote:
> You should have a look here at the work done by Michale Fisher.
> 
> http://www.usbdip.de/en/ethernut2294/index.html
> 
> It shows that the arm code is actually *smaller* than the AVR code (with 
> Max optimization).

I am not sure if this conclusion is justified as Michael's tables are 
based on different compilers. It would be good to see WinAVR vs. WinArm 
or ICCAVR vs ICCARM rather than WinAvr vs. CrossWorks/ARM.

Henrik