[En-Nut-Discussion] AVR vs ARM pgm size

[Ralph Mason]

CrossWorks/ARM = GCC
WinAVR = GCC
WinARM = GCC

Ralph
> Ralph Mason wrote:
>> You should have a look here at the work done by Michale Fisher.
>>
>> http://www.usbdip.de/en/ethernut2294/index.html
>>
>> It shows that the arm code is actually *smaller* than the AVR code 
>> (with Max optimization).
>
> I am not sure if this conclusion is justified as Michael's tables are 
> based on different compilers. It would be good to see WinAVR vs. 
> WinArm or ICCAVR vs ICCARM rather than WinAvr vs. CrossWorks/ARM.
>
> Henrik
> _______________________________________________
> En-Nut-Discussion mailing list
> En-Nut-Discussion at egnite.de
> http://www.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/en-nut-discussion
>