[En-Nut-Discussion] Using AT91SAM7

[Dave Warren]

Hi Angel,

There is not a supported port to CrossWorks, just a small number of people 
who use it and make a few 'hacks' to get it working.

I think the problem with interrupts is in NutEnterCritical. I use the 
..\nut\include\arch\arm\atom.h from 4.2.1 then interrupt works.

I think it would help if we had a page on the website discribing how to use 
Ethernut with Crossworks

regards

Dave Warren

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Angel Sanchez" <angelsp at aumat.es>
To: "Ethernut User Chat (English)" <en-nut-discussion at egnite.de>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 1:08 PM
Subject: [En-Nut-Discussion] Using AT91SAM7


> Hello
>
> I am using Ethernut 4.4.0 with AT91SAM7XC256, compiling both Ethernut and 
> my application with Rowley CrossWorks
>
> My main is only a loop calling NutSleep (100);
>
> I have the following problems:
> - The main loop is executed only the first entry.
> - Tracing the code, I find IRQ interupts disabled permanently
> - Forcing an initial enable, in some point from inside the kernel the 
> interrupt are disabled again
> - In anoter test, including the compiler option -f omit-frame-pointer, the 
> application crash, and seem be a erroneus implementation of
>   NutEnterCritical  (It push the saved csr in stack, changing the offsets 
> to paremeters an local variables)
>
> I am very surprised by this problem, because reading the discussion list, 
> the port seem work correctly.
>
> Can somebody give me some hint about this problems?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Angel Sanchez
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
>